In this post, we will
access if our DIY approach is doing better than indexing in the long run. We
will also try to determine to what it can be mainly attributed.
Many assume it can only
be plain luck. They think DIY investors aka stock pickers can only beat
indexing if they are lucky. Lucky to identify and cash in on big winners or to
avoid big losses or even both.
In the end, the big
question boils down to knowing if DIY Investing is worth the trouble?
We’ll have a look at
our own investing situation to have a better idea.
To be clear, indexing
is probably a better approach for most people. But we are trying to verify
what’s better for us and it definitely may not be better for you.
Why Did We Get into DIY Investing?
Let’s get back to why
we got into DIY investing in the first place.
Our initial DIY
assumptions were to try to obtain similar capital returns (8%) as our
expensive-on-fees mutual funds (indexing was not that accessible yet in those
days) but to do a little better on dividends (4% instead of 3%) and fees
(almost zero versus 2%). Here, we’ll note that indexing solutions, with fees
around 0.5% or even under, are now quite easy to find. In that context, indexing
is already much better than archaic mutual funds.
From the start, our
overall objective was to make 12% long-term (8% capital + 4% dividends +
0% fees) instead of 9% with our old-fashioned funds (8% capital + 3%
dividends - 2% fees).
In fact, doing 2-3% better seemed to be worth the hassle for us.